Tagged: Gray v. Daffy Dan’s Bargaintown

3 Apr, 2018

PTO’s Rejection of Marks Related to Marijuana Should Be Found Unlawful

The United States Patent and Trademark Office rejects trademark applications when it determines that the use of the mark is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act. See In re Brown, 119 USPQ.2d 1350 (TTAB 2016) In the Weeds Between Federal and State Law: Brand Name for continue reading...

Disclaimer

By accessing the TMCA blog, you are requesting information. The information you are requesting is not legal advice, advertising or solicitation. Transmission and receipt of the materials on the blog do not constitute legal advice, establish an attorney-client relationship, or create any duty of Dorsey to any reader. An attorney-client relationship with Dorsey may be established only by an engagement letter signed by a Dorsey lawyer. Information sent to Dorsey by persons who are not clients of the firm is not subject to any duty of confidentiality on the part of the firm.

The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on the blog are the opinions of the authors only and not those of Dorsey.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
Some of the content on this blog is considered Attorney Advertising under the applicable rules of certain states. Results depend on a number of factors unique to each matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Tagged: Gray v. Daffy Dan’s Bargaintown

PTO’s Rejection of Marks Related to Marijuana Should Be Found Unlawful

Subscribe to Blog via Email

About Our IP Practice Group

Categories

Editors

Managers

Disclaimer